CHAPTER  3

Gravity

Gravity

It is truly, the one and only force in the cosmos... 

No matter what we're told by the 'current' model...

Here is true classic physics explanation of Gravity...

Gravity… Described in detail.., along with the fact that is is also the long suspected Aether that even the ancient Greeks knew was needed to carry information through the cosmos.   The light we see by...   Gravity is also the long denied ‘Electromagnetic’ field that is magnetism. They are all one and the same. In fact, gravity is the *only* force in the cosmos.   From our various earth bound POVs we call it different names, depending on how we see it working relative to us alone. Some of the names are Aether, EM attraction, Centrifugal force, Centripetal Force, Inertia, Strong Force, 'Mass Gravity', 'Center Seeking', 'Inertia', and more.   Those individual names may well be needed when talking about those individual aspects.., but never lose the fact that they are all one and the same EM Gravity causing it to happen.

Now we also need to say that this chapter is only the basic explanation. How it works within the particular inertial reference frame(s) we call being 'at rest'... But there is a lot more regarding how it works within the cosmos. Gravity, as well as light and other factors of the cosmos such as contraction are very much affected by 'velocity'.., aka Relativity. We know that gravity strengths, contractions, operating rates, and more are seen to be affected by velocity. This is the Relativity that has been very misunderstood for the most part. We will however go into each of the factors of relativity and describe how they all tie together. How 'velocity' creates relativity.



‘Gravity’ originates in the Atom which are well known to attract each other.  There is only one reason they do that.

Atoms contain positive protons and negative electrons and the interaction between the two charges is what produces the flexible but very well balanced cosmos wide EM attraction.  Because what gravity is and how it works is actually already known. Unfortunately no one has connected the dots.

Looking at bar of copper with an electron microscope and you will see that the bar is actually a three dimensional lattice of copper atoms spaced throughout the bar. Neatly so, because they are all the same element and that they all have pretty much the same charges.

Here is the science we know. That an atom has a nucleus of positive protons and that there are a similar number of negative electrons orbiting each nucleus.  We also know that the positive nuclei will repel from each other equally and as far as possible, within the ‘container’. Think ‘colloidal’…

The electrons orbiting each nucleus are being attracted to it because of their opposite polarities, and likewise attracting the nucleus to themselves as well.

But it seems this is where people stop thinking.

Because... Those negative electrons orbiting each nucleus are not only attracting their own nucleus but their negative field also reaches outward to attract all other positive proton nuclei that happen to be in the neighborhood too. Of course we know distance weakens their attraction, but with distance comes an exponential increase in the number of electrons, for there to be a combined attraction strength..

Then comes a point where the electron's combined strengths, as seen by every nucleus looking outward, will equal their own weakening repulsion strength from each other. The strengths of the two opposing EM polarities will equal and balance. This is then a negative net of attraction reaching out to each of the nuclei to keep them from repelling beyond that balance point. That is their ‘container’ . And this is the shell theorem at the level of the atom. 

When we come to the edge of the bar where there are no more copper atoms on the outside, there are still atoms and molecules in the air and moisture around the bar. So they attract and interact with each other's atoms to form a transition area we call copper oxide.

That is how gravity, electromagnetically holds things together. With mutual balanced electrical repulsion and attraction everything is more or less locked in place. This even validates the idea that the cosmos is infinite. That there is no end to the ‘equal’ attraction from the far side direction.

Then through an infinite number of atom combinations grouping together and mixing with the transition areas the attraction continues outward to the surface of say our earth, where the negative electrons there are still reaching out further still. To mingle with us and all such ‘loose’ objects, holding them to the ground.

The earth's negative field or in other words all of its electron's network of outgoing negative fields are attracting the nuclei of the atmosphere just as the copper bar did, and in turn the combined strength of everything moving with the earth is reaching out into the cosmos. The larger bodies like planets and suns are not so neatly aligned as the copper bar of course because of they are a mix of elements, sizes and attraction strengths. But it is all the same as it is at the level of the atom. Even somewhat on the same size scale.



SHELL THEOREM

This is Newton's explanation for the electromagnetic attraction action detailed above. There is a balance point for every atom, group of atoms and on up to much bigger objects such as the earth, sun, etc. in the cosmos. Where a virtual shell of equal attraction is occurring from all directions at once. *Every* atom, group of atoms, or object, is constantly under what is the equivalent to zero gravity or attraction within this balanced attraction.

Since the cosmos is infinite, the shell is always there, being formed by whatever sources are able to contribute. Actually every atom in the cosmos does contribute to some extent but it is at the shell center where their strengths and numbers balance to produce zero ‘extra’ attraction to any particular direction. The atom or object at the shell’s center is thereby under what we call Inertia.

It is there. The atoms you are made of know that. One needs to heed... :)



INERTIA

It is what we call being within the shell with equal gravity (EM) attraction from all sides and directions at once.

Being in that state allows an object to travel in a straight line through the cosmos with the energy or velocity it was given on send off. Until it is deflected in some way, mostly by stronger gravity in another particular direction..

When it does come near a stronger attraction such as a planet., it will either have its path bent to a degree depending on the strength of the attraction. Or it will be attracted directly into the deflecting source to become a part of it. In rare cases, when it passes a attracting object with the right combination of velocity, mass, and distance.., it will deflect at the needed angle to go into what we call an orbit. As per Newton’s first law…



GRAVITY IS WEAK?

Science thinks gravity is rather weak, but it is actually mind bogglingly powerful.

Gravity is EM with the same relative size strength of any common bar magnet…, no matter how much it is denied by mainstream… They apparently don’t understand that magnetism is usually seen as attracting in one direction only… Whereas gravity is true magnetism that is applied in all directions equally so the objects are always ‘balanced’ and do not feel any specific directional attraction.

We on earth believe that because we can raise our arm against it that it's weaker than we are. Pretty egotistical if you ask me... :) But being on the earth, our whole body is part of the earth and our atoms are all moving in tune with it. We are part of earth's inertial frame of gravity strength. And the only reason one can raise their arm, or waves can form on the seas, or trees can grow upwards, is the extremely fine counter balanced EM attraction (gravity) of the cosmos. The gravity from the cosmos is 'allowing' it all to happen. Just as I said elsewhere that the earth is attracting the cosmos, the cosmos is pulling on the earth, and each of us in all outward directions at once. So we do not feel earth’s massive gravity but rather just the very well balanced force that exists throughout the cosmos. As is the case from the atom and the copper bar, on up to the entire cosmos. We and all other matter on its surface and in its vicinity are slightly more attracted to Earth only because we are right here on it.., a part of it...

But if Earth were alone in the cosmos.., and surface seeking was the only gravity, we would be ‘magnetically’ pulled down to it so strongly that we would be nothing more than a coating of slime on the rock we were standing.

On the other hand if we jumped into the air and the earth and moon suddenly disappeared, the cosmic gravity would allow our body to continue traveling through space in whatever straight line we were traveling when they disappeared. That of course is called ‘Inertia’ but again caused by ‘Gravity’.

In reality, with the earth being just a small group of atoms within the overwhelming but unfelt outward pull of the cosmos, the earth’s gravity is balanced just enough to hold things to itself, and even less to attract objects to it that are in it's near space vicinity, man-made satellites and the moon in particular. These objects are also pulling the earth to themselves but their distance, size, and velocity in space causes them to be at an exact center of balance between the EM attraction (gravity) of the earth and the cosmos.

From our human POV, most objects in space have a negligible effect on the earth in that regard. Although we do see the ocean tides and the earth's wobble being caused by the moon with the mutual attraction there is between the earth and the moon.



AETHER

Gravity itself is the long suspected and known to be needed media the ancient Greeks called 'Aether' for information to travel over. Even they so long ago understood it was not possible for a message to be sent without a carrier to deliver it.

Looking back at the description of EM attraction and balance, we can see that ‘Gravity’ is indeed the Aether. It is ubiquitious. It's tiniest perturbations, up to suns exploding and larger changes are all felt instantly throughout the cosmos... It has simply been a case of not seeing the forest for the trees.

With the well balanced network of positive and negative charges in the cosmos.., we see it as a static charge. It is just there, not moving at all, as that which is contained in the dielectric of a charged capacitor. A near zero level electrical balance, only varying in intensity.. caused by suns exploding and things passing by. Such as the moon for instance. It is perturbing the EM field of gravity to the point of affecting the ebb and flow of earth's tides.., and to even wobble the earth itself.

That is information..! The moon is using gravity to tell the earth of its position as it circles the earth.

To carry this forward, the mass of the electron also affects the EM field of gravity just as the moon does. It's the same physics... It's just a matter of size.

Since we know from the Chapter on Light, that electrons are what deliver the EM spectra's of light to us.., and that they are actually spectra of EM gravity strengths. They pass those variations of gravity strengths to our eyes.., to wobble the rods and cones of our retinas... Again as described in much more detail in the chapter on Light.

The AETHER then is Gravity that has light's EM spectrum perturbations impressing it at the speed we measure it being created. Here within our constantly changing relativistic hallucination we call being ‘at rest’... Not to mention that we see light as being instantaneous too. As explained in classic physics detail in the chapter on Light... There is no 'c'. There is no S.O.L. There is no 'Invariance'.


CENTER SEEKING GRAVITY

This is another aspect of gravity that is generally accepted as being true, but in fact is totally false.

An object being attracted to the earth for instance, falls to the surface at a speed of 32 ft per second squared. A fellow named Felix jumped from a weather balloon from 24 miles up and he reached a speed of over 800 mph before pulling the rip cord. Because of course the entire earth was pulling him faster and faster to its surface the closer he got to it..

From that it is thought that if objects were to fall into an imaginary tube through the center of the earth, they would increasing their falling velocity at that same rate. Until they passed the earth's center. At which point they would start to slow more and more by that so called 'center seeking' gravity, until reaching the other side and climbing out. The entire trip through the earth taking just 42 minutes.

But in fact there is no such major gravity source at the center of any object. The entire idea is ludicrous. To the point of me feeling somewhat foolish thinking I even feel a need to explain it.

What is true is that it is at the surface of every object where gravity is strongest. Taking the earth for instance., Felix was attracted by the entire mass of the earth. Eight thousand miles of it through to the other side. That is the gravity presented at every single point on the earth's surface.

But, it is thought that if there were a hole through the earth, and ignoring the heat.., if one were to fall in it they would build up that same downward speed. They likely would.., but only for a relatively short distance, as they would start to accumulate more and more of earth's gravity producing mass above them, which would be attracting them back towards the surface. By the time they reached a thousand miles into the earth, there would definitely be a large amount of that upward attraction to be slowing them quite significantly...

By the time they reached the center they will have pretty much slowed to a stop. They would at that point be getting attracted by four thousand miles of the earth's gravity in all directions.. The equivalent to being in zero gravity. As if they were in deep space.

One point I want to be clear on is that science *does* measure gravity attractions between various objects from their centers., but only for the sake of accuracy in the distance between each of them to the others. So the eight thousand miles of earth's distance would not be ignored or perhaps included twice.




TRAVELING GRAVITY WAVES

There are no 'traveling' gravity waves. There are of course positive and negative strengths constantly going higher or lower within the overall balanced condition of the cosmos. So there is an absolute need for instantaneous rebalancing corrections to be made by every object in the cosmos. Anywhere from microscopic distances to perhaps millions of miles. There’s a lot going on out there and there is no time for delay in what needs to be done as with the ‘traveling’ gravity waves they claim exist. Gravity waves cannot and do not exist for many proven reasons. The LIGO not withstanding., as explained below. Changes to gravity strengths are felt in real time throughout the cosmos.

What good would traveling waves do even if they did exist? Just 'bumping' various planets and other objects they passed in their travels... Where would they be going..? What good would they do when they got there..? Would they know when they got there..? Would they ever get there..??????

Changes in gravity strength will happen from stars rotating, exploding, or most any other changing motion in the cosmos. I could have told them that without the LIGO being built.

So whatever is seen, felt, or measured gravity wise, needs to be understood as happening in real time. Gravity itself is instantaneous as descried fully by Newton, many scientific papers, and most emphatically and empirically in the Aether section of this chapter.

To have gravity ‘waves’ traveling through the cosmos would be very dangerous for the cosmos too. Those from two or more sources would act like any other two waves and mix to form interference patterns. Rocking the cosmos as they went in and out of phase. Causing Inertial travel to be bumpy... And that is not the worse part. Certain frequencies could cause square waves. Alternate jolts of zero gravity followed by double gravity. They would destroy the cosmos.., at least up to one of the offending sources.



FURTHER ON THE LIGO

The LIGO cannot possible detect gravity waves even if they did exist. Which for many well known reasons do not.

The LIGO is firmly attached to the ground. So as the earth rotates itself, circles the sun, the solar system moves with the galaxy, and our galaxy moves through the universe.., it's gravity detection direction is being swung wildly around the cosmos from end to end in the blink of an eye...

It cannot be pointed to, focused on, or held at any tiny speck 50 bly out in the cosmos for any time at all... Especially to see any part of that binary star system's eight minute cycle, as was claimed they did...

Not to mention they say they somehow had some notice of this 'unexpected' occurrence for them to have time to set up an optical telescope, to then watch the incoming gravity wave coinciding with the incoming visible spectrum. lmao.

Best forget anything you read about the LIGO.



BLACK HOLES

Here we tell you what they're supposed to be, why they cannot be, and then what they truly are.

There are an infinite number of galaxies in the cosmos. Each consisting of billions of stars, planets, moons, etc. circling a centeral point.., and each appearing to be spiraling inward toward that center in a whirlpool type movement. It is believed those centers are super strong gravity objects called black holes that suck in all the surrounding stars and such into itself. That the suns and such on the outside edge would be slowly drawn closer and closer, moving faster and faster into that 'black hole' center. That in fact the center object is 'devouring' the entire galaxy.

But what is known to have that much gravity..? And isn't it said that black holes tear atoms apart? Since atoms produce gravity where would the black hole's gravity then be coming from? So even with some massive sun's collapse to what's left of it's mass after burning out, and if the atoms were still somehow working, how is it possible for that collapsed remains to have any more gravity than it did when it was still the original giant star or whatever to begin with.

There are other questions... Where did the galaxies come from in the first place? If they did come together on their own from all those arbitrary locations in the cosmos., how did they manage to navigate those long curving paths to come in to the tail end of those outermost spirals.., and at the correct velocity too.. To await their turn to be devoured..? :) Of course all of that is illogical and ludicrous.

The bigger problem for today's foolish thinking is that the whirlpool idea has been totally disproved, way back in 1972.., by Vera Rubin. A well respected astronomer cosmologist they have since named a major observatory after. The one that houses the largest observatory lens in the world., as well as now hosing the world's largest camera. She found that all spiral arms of galaxies were rotating at the same rate. That there is no inward speedup towards the center. That galaxies are turning more like flat disks.


Or even more like the lawn sprinkler on your front lawn. With a center nozzle spewing water as it spins around. All the droplets of water being thrown straight out from the center and in the process forming the appearance of a new spiral on every revolution. Which then joins those already moving outward.

As does our own sun. It emits 'solar wind'. Solar wind consists of electrons, protons, neutrons., and other particals that atoms are made of. So it is not a big jump to believe that massive sources of solar winds have been spreading those building blocks of atoms in the same way as your lawn sprinkler spreads the water. These particles with their charges find each other and come together again to form new atoms. Then proceeding to build suns, planets, and in general the galaxy around the source.

So that much better and logical answer is that Galaxy centers are Quasars..! Quasars in fact have long been suspected of being involved in galaxy creation. While not being 'technically' correct, they are what could be more meaningfully called 'white' holes. Creating their galaxies and not devouring them. Some still very active and burning bright, but most having spewed out so much of their own mass in creating their galaxies that they have lost the ability to keep their own nuclear furnace burning. As our own Milky Wav center is now considered dormant too.



DARK MATTER

Tying directly into the above, that Quasars are creating galaxies.., we see the true explanation of Dark Matter too.

Dark Matter is totally explainable with everyday science. It is the cosmos renewing itself.., as it must, to remain eternal. Here's the classic physics explanation for it and it’s not mysterious at all...

All the stars in every galaxy are tearing apart their own atoms with their ongoing nuclear explosions... They spew out the bits..; electrons, protons, neutrons, and more, in what we call solar wind from our own sun. The bits are particles after all. They do not just vaporize… They do not accumulate in some cosmic graveyard for ripped apart atoms. What happens is that the electrons and protons with their charges simply attract and find each other again. So they simply come together to form new atoms. They first connect to form hydrogen and continue becoming ‘heavier’ from there.

That process of growing larger is very easily explainable too. Involving another totally so called force of the cosmos… The backward idea of Atomic decay… Just another version of atoms being destroyed you think..? Wrong..! The cosmos would not last too long if all it was doing was *destroying* itself…

Atomic decay is actually that process of atoms rebuilding. Mainstream just has another one backward… Take for instance c-14 used in carbon dating… Where a neutron becomes more positive to stand in for an as yet still missing proton.. The neutron doesn’t ‘eject’ a proton… lol Isn’t there a strong force. ??

But back to those newly formed single atoms… Obviously we can’t *see* them but we do register all the gravity they’re producing. It being seen mostly from within the galaxies that are creating the raw material for them to form. Then because we can’t see them, mainstream calls them ‘mysterious’. It seems that’s all it takes for most of today's scientists. lol

Those invisible atoms attract more and more of themselves together, and eventually come to form larger objects that can be seen.., like dust, nebulae, rocks, planets and finally new stars, to start the whole process over again. Does anyone think those large *visible* things just pop out of nowhere, full-blown from nothing..?? Wanna bet that can’t happen..?

The cosmos recycles itself. It must if it is to remain eternal... :/