CHAPTER  5

LIGHT - Updated June 2026

LIGHT

This is what light is and how it works.  It is absolutely profound.   Thee most mysterious of the phenomenons out there.   We give you a complete and detailed description of light, and it is solid...

What is presented here answers all the questions.

First.., here is what is believed.

Light is said to be the fastest speed in the cosmos, at about 186,000 miles a second.  It is said to be absolutely invariant in all situations, and referred to as 'c' for conversation, calculus, and its constant...

Light measures 'c' no matter the speed or direction the source or viewer are moving. ??

Light appears to be a particle at times and a wave at other times.  ??     

Light ‘photons’ are said to be mass-less but can be deflected by gravity.  ??

It is also said that the particle and wave characteristic is a dual nature.  Meaning photons are both a particle and a wave more or less at the same time. ??

 

This did not compute with us.  As we have worked with the electromagnetic spectrum for most of my life.... 

So we submit that no one seems to have any idea of what’s going on with light. Our ‘modern’ physics are way off track. The only real answers are based on Classic Physics… GR, SR, and all the rest including photons, expansion, dark energy, etc. are just opinions based on surface observations and just plain dumb.

It’s all proven and well known Classic Physics based science. All the dots are already proven but apparently no one has yet to put them in the correct order to describe how light is delivered and disbursed to be seen, as I do here.

Still, I know many will try to reduce these true science facts to what they've been told and bonded to for so long. Unfortunately that’s a problem most humans have yet to overcome. In any case here are the true known answers to all of it. The so called expansion, faster and faster, dark energy, and a lot more.

COSMOS EXPANSION AMD RED SHIFT  

The fact is that the Big Bang, Cosmic Expansion, Dark Energy etc. are all based on nothing more than the red shift Hubble found. But the red shift that Hubble found in light from distant galaxies did not mean the cosmos was expanding. He didn't believe it either and tried in vain to keep the idea from spreading. But the sensation loving newspapers and sci-fi loving public kept it going. So now of course it's being taught in colleges as mainstream by people who call themselves scientists.., and educators. :/

 

Yes there is a second classic physics explanation for red shift that does *not* require distancing… It is well known that the EM spectra of light constantly lose their high end frequencies as they travel towards us. This causes the rest of the wavelengths below to become longer on average. Those longer wave lengths are what Hubble saw as red shift, but again they are not caused by any expanding distance. The Big Bang was imagined, created, and believed by very short sighted people.

If you think that the colors we see or whatever spectral lines that are not changing wavelengths disproves this, you’re wrong. Spectral lines need particular wave lengths to be in.., indicating what produced them. The same as humans have evolved to see and need particular wave lengths to see particular *colors*. Blue centered around 470 nm for example… So when the spectrum is seen as red shifted by our measuring devices, all the needed wave lengths will be there. Just found higher up the spectrum, coming from between higher numbered peaks that are now the needed 'lengths'. All visible and otherwise needed, along with any spectral line, wavelengths will always be there somewhere on the spectrum., no matter what numbered peaks they happen to be coming from at any instant.

The misconstrued 'faster and faster' and the mysterious and inexplicable Dark Energy are explained away in light's delivery and distribution paragraphs below.

The whole story of light is classic physics, already known and accepted by science. Current mainstream tries to hide it and mock it but it’s still there. Solid… Like a rock..!

PHOTONS DEBUNKED   

To start, you have to forget what you hear about ‘photons’… Newton offhandedly imagined them up about 360 years ago. He called them corpuscles back then… They’ve been renamed photons more recently, apparently to make them sound more legit. But they’re still imagined. Newton had no idea what light was 360 years ago… :/

They are described as tiny, single frequency bits of self contained energy that travel billions of light years though the cosmos totally unaffected…, just so each one can illuminate a single microscopic speck of my living room wall… *If* they match the color I picked for it… It seems rather far fetched if you ask me.

But beyond that, since they are each said to be a single frequency, that makes them ‘sine’ waves. Which as real scientists should know are never found in any spectrum… Ask any audiophile for that matter. They know too. There is an infinite difference between a ‘sine’ wave and a ‘spectrum’ wave if you did not happen to know that.

So no need to explain why photons are not ‘bits’ either, as is claimed. Which seems only done to support Quantum’s effort to create a ‘digital’ copy of the analog spectrum. They seem bent on ways to build models of how they think, or want us to think., the cosmos runs. But of course if they were bits., and each one a ‘single frequency’, it would mean there would have to be enough of them to cover every single wave length in the spectrum, one to one… There being an infinite number of wavelength starting points between every two adjoining peaks of a spectrum, and there being many trillions of peaks.. That’s a lot of infinities.

I did a very conservative estimate awhile back on how many photons it would take to produce the light we see in a single hour.., and it came out to be infinity^3… Of course I know that’s not a real number.., but it’s close… :/ There aren’t enough electrons in the entire cosmos to produce that many ‘photons’…

LIGHT'S DELIVERY AND DISPERSAL

Photons not existing, in truth and fact, we know it is the *electron* that ‘brings’ light to us.

But before you start chuckling you best read the rest… It is well proven in many ways…

Read slowly too. Cause while the words are undeniable classic physics, as intuitive as Occam can be.., you’ve most likely been indoctrinated by mainstream for so long you believe theirs is the only truth. You need to try and see through those earlier imagined falsehoods.

First there is the fact that when they fire electrons at the twin slit they get the exact same light and dark bars as when they think they’re firing photons… They’re really firing electrons and photons are not needed, nor could they produce light even if they did exist

So we see that light is actually ‘delivered’ by the electron… Electrons radiate their (de Broglie) pilot wave outward as they travel through the cosmos. Or my living room which is also part of the cosmos.. That outgoing wavefront is then blue shifted in the forward direction by the velocity of the electron itself, which produces a shock wave shaped, circular, globular EM spectrum with the highest frequency in the center line of travel.

It is the electron that is the long suspected particle part of light’s EM spectrum creation. So the particle and the wave it produces are as separate and distinct as any boat is from the waves it produces on the water it travels on.

There is no magical non-physics ‘DUALITY’. Nor superposition either, for that matter.

Now comes the even harder part. That an electron being a particle with mass and charge, it is that the ‘pilot wave’ EM spectrum is actually a perturbation of the EM field of gravity. Just as the moon does as it orbits the earth. Perturbing gravity enough to affect the ebb and flow of tides, and to wobble the earth too. The only difference between the two are their size and amount…

The electron delivers its circular target shaped EM spectrum of gravity strengths to whatever surface it happens to run into. Surfaces can be your living room wall, a microwave dish, your eyeballs, etc. That surface is where visible and otherwise usable light is first created. The highest frequency or ‘strongest gravity strength’ of the blue shifted spectra is determined by how much velocity the electrons are given on send off, which determines how much blue shifting each electron can do. Everything warm emits electrons… Human bodies get it up to infra-red and stars get it up to blue and above. A simple and very good analogy to this is a submarine traveling through the ocean… It is pushing the non compressible sea ahead of it the hardest, and less so around the curve to the sides. Each of those amounts of push are instantly transferred through the sea to the all the surrounding distant shores to produce miniature tsunamis of various strength.

It is the mass of the electron that is being deflected by gravitation.

Mass-less light itself cannot be deflected.

It is the mass of the electron that moves things that ‘light’ hits.

Mass-less light cannot move anything.

That the incoming EM spectrum is circular is the reason light is polar.

That the incoming EM spectrum is globular is the reason the outer longer wave lengths hit the angled side of a prism first for red to be sent through. Then as the shorter and shorter wave lengths are skidded into the glass the rest of the colors are sent through in turn.

It is the EM spectrum of gravity strengths being that is laid onto whatever surface the electron happens to hit. The electron is absorbed by the surface atoms and the spectrum’s various gravity strengths, aka waves lengths, are reflected (bounced), refracted, prismed, filtered, absorbed and/or passed through according to the sizes of the surface atoms, molecules, their *arrangement*, and consistency.

Keep in mind again, that the EM spectra of light are *truly* complex variations of gravity strengths’ that are perturbing the existing EM field of gravity. Surfaces are where light is first created. There is no light between any source and the surface you see it coming from.

The sky is black at night. They need mist in the air to hold a light show. Shine a flashlight on the wall in a dark room and you will see the light created on the wall coming at you but you will not see the beam that is causing it to happen. Lastly of course, when you look directly at a star or any source, the surface is your eyeballs… The wave lengths are then passed through to your retinas… The spectra of gravity perturbations are sent through to wobble the rods and cones of your retinas… Just as the moon’s perturbations wobble the earth.

When we monitor one of the slits in the twin slit experiment those light delivering electrons run into the half mirror and are absorbed. They are prevented from bringing their spectrum to the back wall. There is no so-called ‘wave collapse’ because some bits or whatever know they’re being looked at. No more than the moon is not there unless it *is* being looked at. Where does this idiociy come from..? Hmm. Albert and the early not to smart founders of quantum. :/ With all those ideas being put forth It seems we’re just being tested to determine our level of ‘stupid’… :/

I personally think Albert and his school chums of were really a bunch of clowns hoping to make names for themselves. He throwing a chair in class, skipping classes *he* didn’t think important., never doing anything but daydreaming up ideas..? His gravity stretching time has been totally falsified but no one wants to give it up. Schrodinger coming up with his intended as a joke dead/alive cat contraption. Have you ever heard the term ‘Schrodinger’s douchebag’..? Look it up… You’ll see there are some out there who *sarcastically* show they know what’s truly going on.

Those ‘school chums’, Albert, Born, Bohr, Lorentz, Schrodinger, Dirac, and others worked together, changing each others minds, etc. to homogenize all their surface observations into the basic concepts of how they wanted us to think the cosmos worked back then. It looks like they were going on the idea that people would say ‘they can’t be all wrong, can they….? Of course they were…! They had no clue back then… Since then they’re devised mainstream and Wiki to make their ideas public. Along with very much Peer Review censor board, to insure alternate thinking never got off the ground.

But.., back to de Broglie… He also found that the electron slowed as it travels. This lowers the amount of blue shifting it gives to the spectrum it’s producing… So, as stated above, its high end frequency is constantly lowering. Which causes the rest of the lower wave lengths to be longer on average…

*This* again explains the red shift that Hubble found, which has nothing to do with those sources distancing themselves from us.

That’s not the end of it either. When electrons gets to us from the most distant galaxies the high end of their spectrums are down to the bottom of the ‘visible’ spectrum.. This is the reason there’s an edge to the ‘visible’ universe. Light from beyond has already gone below.

But.., not to worry. Because the rest of the spectrum below the visible are still coming in and we can and do use those microwave and lower radio waves to see well beyond the edge of the visible universe.

Now comes the faster and faster expansion thinking that gave mainstream a chance to make up Dark Energy, another magical inexplicable and dumbass force…

The true story is that when the constantly slowing electrons from the distant galaxies get to about 6–8 billion light years out from the earth, this is where the high end of their spectra have lowered to the ‘top’ of the visible spectrum. When the ‘visible’ spectra start getting cut into it produces a more pronounced red shift. So you should see by now that increased red shift is *not* because the cosmos just decided to increase its rate of expansion or inflation speed.

There is no non physics DARK ENERGY. But didn’t you always suspect that anyway? :)

CMBR

CMBR, aka Background Radiation, is nothing more than a cosmos sized version of the TSR. Our toy version using only two slits of rather strong light to mix and create an interference pattern on the back wall... If there were an 'antenna' placed midway to that back wall, it would surely pick up a rather harsh and -raspy buzz.   OTOH all the galaxies out there are the equivalent to thousands of individual slits of much lower light levels, but are producing the same interference pattern on their way to the earth as the back wall. In that case our 'antennas' simply pick up a much lower and softer hiss.., one that we call 'white noise'.., and also CMBR. It is still Cosmos Radiation but it's certainly not some left over buzz or echo from any Big Bang explosion. 
 

 

That answers just about all the observed, known and still unknown facets to light’s delivery and the weirdness people wonder about. If anyone would care to debate any of this, please tell me what part of classic physics you deny.

For now you can find me on Quora. Floyd-Baker-8. Please don’t waste your time telling me someone else says it’s done their way. That stuff doesn't matter. :/ If you think what I’ve described is not possible please say why yourself..? With known science… ??

Again, there are no Photons, no Duality, no Super Position, no Big Bang, no CMBR echo from it, no Cosmic Expansion, no Faster and Faster., and of course no Dark Energy…

I make nothing up of my own… I only arrange known dots in their correct order. Along with falsifying a lot of totally misunderstood guesswork.

There is more to say too… Which I will be doing as I move forward with the updateing.

I will be explaining in great detail..;

Why the third polar filter allows light to pass after it's blocked by the first two.

Why Gravity is what it is the one and only force in the cosmos.

Why why be perceive light as being invariant.

So hang ten for awhile and you'll soon be diving into how how more things really work.. :)